Building Trustworthy Agentic Ai Systems FOR Personalized Banking Experiences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63278/mme.vi.1714Keywords:
Agentic AI, Trustworthy AI, Personalized Banking, AI Ethics, Responsible AI, Financial Services, AI Transparency, Customer-Centric Banking, Intelligent Agents, Data Privacy, AI in Finance, Adaptive AI Systems, User Trust, Banking Innovation, Secure AI, Explainable AI, Digital Banking, AI Governance, Ethical Banking Technology, Smart Customer EngagementAbstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems have become ubiquitous in contemporary society and have the potential for transformative impact on user behavior. These systems are capable of learning autonomously to personalize their behavior to deliver improved user experiences. However, there exists the potential for unintended consequences, as the same agentic features associated with positive outcomes may also increase the capacity for negative outcomes. Financial services is an example of a domain where deploying AI systems with agentic features would be high risk. The automated decision-making capabilities of these systems could influence billions of dollars. Nonetheless, they would be entrusted with taking actions that affect users without human oversight, such as reallocating entire portfolios of assets in ways that users do not wish. Therefore, a foundational requirement for adopting these systems must be the capacity to build shared norms of beneficial behavior prior to their deployment.
Several commercially available AI systems with agentic features are already deployed in the domain of personal banking. Automated personal financial management combines categorization of transactions followed by predictions of future expenditure and savings to improve budgeting decisions, amongst other impacts. Digital banking assistants embed intelligent conversational agents used primarily for accessing banking information and services. These systems typically operate in conjunction with non-intelligent user interfaces, and thus the extent of agentic features in user-bank interactions is limited. However, envisionable advancements include wider adoption of natural language processing capabilities, comparative financial analysis, and customized query suggestions.
Agentic AI systems must operate under a formal specification of trustworthiness constraints. Therefore, AI agents must embody the technical requirements for trustworthy AI systems. Management of risks associated with agentic AI is a dangerous task given the scale of money flows in financial markets and the unprecedented scale, scope, and speed of analysis, prediction, and execution in such markets. At the same time, AI systems that endow agents with entity-level legal ownership and agency create a scarcity that could be captured in trust funds in the form of wealth to protect a material asset class from better prediction by other agents (all other predictions being sub-optimal). Glücksspiel unter Vertrauensbildung para-poker could be a conceptually rigorous game of chance. Thereby, the proposed system could help to promote beneficial forms of AI agency while governing risks effectively.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ramesh Inala, Bharath Somu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their published articles online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website, social networks like ResearchGate or Academia), as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Except where otherwise noted, the content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



According to the