Comparative Analysis of 2D-CAD Comparison with Custom-Trained Computer Vision Models
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63278/1417Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence algorithms, machine learning, computer vision, custom training object detection models, YOLOv8m, YOLOv8x, YOLO-NAS, Faster R-CNN, CAD compare, PyTesseract, Paddle OCR.Abstract
In manufacturing environments, the ability to efficiently compare and analyze 2D Computer-Aided Design (CAD) drawings is critical for ensuring product quality, minimizing errors, and streamlining the design iteration process. Traditional manual comparison methods are time-intensive and prone to human errors, particularly when analyzing annotations, dimensions, and complex structural details. To address these challenges, this study presents a comparative analysis of state-of-the-art deep learning models—YOLOv8m, YOLOv8x, YOLO-NAS, and Faster R-CNN—for automated CAD design evaluation. The models were trained on a dataset of 5,000 CAD images, encompassing diverse mechanical components with varying complexities. The proposed system leverages object detection and Optical Character Recognition (OCR) techniques to extract and compare dimensions and notes with high precision. Experimental results demonstrate that YOLOv8m outperforms other models in terms of detection accuracy. The findings highlight the effectiveness of deep learning-based CAD comparison systems in reducing verification time and improving design evaluation accuracy. This study provides insights into the strengths and limitations of different computer vision models for CAD analysis, contributing to the advancement of automated design validation in manufacturing industries. This approach enhances the recognition accuracy of deep learning models, making dimension extraction and recognition more practical. The system achieves 90-95% accuracy in detecting dimensions and notes in the CAD designs, and 85-90% accuracy in text recognition. These findings highlight the effectiveness of AI-driven CAD comparison systems in reducing verification time and improving design evaluation accuracy, contributing to the advancement of automated design validation in manufacturing industries.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Roshni Sundrani, Shashikant V. Athawale

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their published articles online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website, social networks like ResearchGate or Academia), as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Except where otherwise noted, the content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



According to the