Examine the Influence of AI Tools on the Workflow of Dermatology Practice, Focusing on Diagnostic Efficiency, Patient Management, and Clinician Decision-Making

Authors

  • Haifa Hassan Jannah Consultant of Dermatology and Head of Dermatology Department in Pioneer Care Polyclinic, Saudi Arabia.
  • Dalia Fahad Ramadan MBBS Program, Fakeeh College for Medical Sciences, 21461, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
  • Ranad Mohammed Khashab MBBS Program, Fakeeh College for Medical Sciences, 21461, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
  • Shokran Faisal Sulaimani MBBS Program, Fakeeh College for Medical Sciences, 21461, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • Abeer Muala Alahmadi Post Graduate Program of Family Medicine, Jeddah First Health Cluster, – Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
  • Nada Abdulghani Sarooji Jeddah First Health Cluster, – Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
  • Hanan Fawaz Sabban King Abdullah Medical Complex - Academic Affair Department, Ministry of Health – Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
  • Saud Ghalib Almahdaly East Jeddah Hospital Health Cluster 1, Saudi Arabia.
  • Sara Waleed Hefni MBBS Program, Fakeeh College for Medical Sciences, 21461, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63278/10.63278/mme.v31.1

Abstract

Introduction: Skin conditions are an important health issue. On average, individuals experience 1.6 skin conditions each year, with skin-related doctor appointments making up 20% of all primary care visits, of which approximately 35% are directed to a dermatologist. Machine learning (ML) models have the potential to assist primary care professionals by analyzing and enhancing intricate datasets. Furthermore, ML models are being more commonly used in dermatology for aiding in diagnosis through image analysis, particularly for detecting and categorizing skin cancer.

Aim: This research seeks to validate a machine learning image analysis model prospectively as a diagnostic aid for diagnosing dermatological conditions.

Method: In this upcoming study, 100 successive patients seeking care for a skin issue from a participating general practitioner (GP) in central Catalonia were selected. The planned duration for data collection was set at 7 months. Anonymized images of skin conditions were captured and fed into the ML model interface (able to detect 44 different skin conditions), which provided the top 5 diagnoses with the highest probability. The identical picture was also transmitted for a teledermatology consultation in accordance with the established workflow. The GP, ML model, and dermatologist's evaluations will be compared to determine the precision, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the ML model. Each type of skin disease class will have its results displayed globally and individually through a confusion matrix and the one-versus-all approach. The amount of time needed to conduct the diagnosis will also be factored in.

Results: Patient enrollment started in June 2021 and continued for a duration of 5 months. At present, all participants have been enrolled and the images have been presented to the GPs and dermatologists. The examination of the findings has already commenced.

Conclusion: This research will offer insights into the efficacy and constraints of ML models. External testing is necessary for controlling these diagnostic systems for the implementation of ML models in a primary care environment.

References

Sánchez-Sagrado T. Are there too many or too few physicians in Spain? migration: the eternal resource. Rev Clin Esp (English Ed) 2013 Oct;213(7):347-353. [CrossRef]

Lim HW, Collins SAB, Resneck JS, Bolognia JL, Hodge JA, Rohrer TA, et al. The burden of skin disease in the United States. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017 May;76(5):958-972.e2. [CrossRef] [Medline]

Schofield JK, Fleming D, Grindlay D, Williams H. Skin conditions are the commonest new reason people present to general practitioners in England and Wales. Br J Dermatol 2011 Nov;165(5):1044-1050. [CrossRef] [Medline]

Tensen E, van der Heijden JP, Jaspers MWM, Witkamp L. Two decades of teledermatology: current status and integration in national healthcare systems. Curr Dermatol Rep 2016 Mar 28;5:96-104 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]

Servei Català de la Salut. Activitat assistencial de la xarxa sanitària de Catalunya, any 2012: registre del conjunt mínim bàsic de dades (CMBD). Barcelona: Departament de Salut. 2013 Apr. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/11351/1025 [accessed 2022-08-11]

Lowell BA, Froelich CW, Federman DG, Kirsner RS. Dermatology in primary care: prevalence and patient disposition. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001 Aug;45(2):250-255. [CrossRef] [Medline]

Porta N, San Juan J, Grasa M, Simal E, Ara M, Querol I. Diagnostic agreement between primary care physicians and dermatologists in the health area of a referral hospital. Actas Dermosifiliogr (English Ed) 2008 Apr;99(3):207-212 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]

López Seguí F, Franch Parella J, Gironès García X, Mendioroz Peña J, García Cuyàs F, Adroher Mas C, et al. A cost-minimization analysis of a medical record-based, store and forward and provider-to-provider telemedicine compared to usual care in Catalonia: more agile and efficient, especially for users. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020 Mar 18;17(6):2008 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]

Potter B, Ronan SG. Computerized dermatopathologic diagnosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1987 Jul;17(1):119-131. [CrossRef] [Medline]

Talebi-Liasi F, Markowitz O. Is artificial intelligence going to replace dermatologists? Cutis 2020 Jan;105(1):28-31. [Medline]

Börve A, Dahlén Gyllencreutz J, Terstappen K, Johansson Backman E, Aldenbratt A, Danielsson M, et al. Smartphone teledermoscopy referrals: a novel process for improved triage of skin cancer patients. Acta Derm Venereol 2015 Feb;95(2):186-190 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]

Finnane A, Dallest K, Janda M, Soyer HP. Teledermatology for the diagnosis and management of skin cancer: a systematic review. JAMA Dermatol 2017 Mar 01;153(3):319-327. [CrossRef] [Medline]

Ferrer RT, Bezares AP, Mañes AL, Mas AV, Gutiérrez IT, Lladó CN, et al. Diagnostic reliability of an asynchronous teledermatology consultation. Article in Spanish. Aten Primaria 2009 Oct;41(10):552-557 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]

Mounessa JS, Chapman S, Braunberger T, Qin R, Lipoff JB, Dellavalle RP, et al. A systematic review of satisfaction with teledermatology. J Telemed Telecare 2018 May;24(4):263-270. [CrossRef] [Medline]

Vidal-Alaball J, Álamo-Junquera D, López-Aguilá S, García-Altés A. Evaluation of the impact of teledermatology in decreasing the waiting list in the Bages region (2009-2012). Article in Spanish. Aten Primaria 2015 May;47(5):320-321 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]

Vidal-Alaball J, López Seguí F, Garcia Domingo JL, Flores Mateo G, Sauch Valmaña G, RuizComellas A, et al. Primary care professionals' acceptance of medical record-based, store and forward provider-to-provider telemedicine in Catalonia: results of a web-based survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020 Jun 08;17(11):4092 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]

Lee MK, Rich K. Who is included in human perceptions of AI?: trust and perceived fairness around healthcare AI and cultural mistrust. 2021 May Presented at: CHI '21: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; May 8-13, 2021; Yokohama, Japan p. 1-14. [CrossRef]

Calisto FM, Ferreira A, Nascimento JC, Gonçalves D. Towards touch-based medical image diagnosis annotation. 2017 Oct 17 Presented at: ISS '17: Interactive Surfaces and Spaces; October 17-20, 2017; Brighton, United Kingdom p. 390-395. [CrossRef]

Calisto FM, Santiago C, Nunes N, Nascimento JC. Introduction of human-centric AI assistant to aid radiologists for multimodal breast image classification. Int J Hum Comput Stud 2021 Jun;150:102607. [CrossRef]

Calisto FM, Nunes N, Nascimento JC. BreastScreening: on the use of multi-modality in medical imaging diagnosis. 2020 Sep Presented at: AVI '20: International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces; September 28 to October 2, 2020; Salerno, Italy p. 1-5. [CrossRef]

Attia ZI, Harmon DM, Behr ER, Friedman PA. Application of artificial intelligence to the electrocardiogram. Eur Heart J 2021 Dec 07;42(46):4717-4730 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]

Wells A, Patel S, Lee JB, Motaparthi K. Artificial intelligence in dermatopathology: diagnosis, education, and research. J Cutan Pathol 2021 Aug 26;48(8):1061-1068. [CrossRef] [Medline]

Thomsen K, Iversen L, Titlestad TL, Winther O. Systematic review of machine learning for diagnosis and prognosis in dermatology. J Dermatolog Treat 2020 Aug;31(5):496-510. [CrossRef] [Medline]

Du AX, Emam S, Gniadecki R. Review of machine learning in predicting dermatological outcomes. Front Med (Lausanne) 2020 Jun 12;7:266 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]

Gomolin A, Netchiporouk E, Gniadecki R, Litvinov IV. Artificial intelligence applications in dermatology: where do we stand? Front Med (Lausanne) 2020 Mar 31;7:100 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]

Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa RA, Ko J, Swetter SM, Blau HM, et al. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature 2017 Feb 02;542(7639):115-118 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]

Morid MA, Borjali A, Del Fiol G. A scoping review of transfer learning research on medical image analysis using ImageNet. Comput Biol Med 2021 Jan;128:104115. [CrossRef] [Medline]

Liu Y, Jain A, Eng C, Way DH, Lee K, Bui P, et al. A deep learning system for differential diagnosis of skin diseases. Nat Med 2020 Jun 18;26(6):900-908. [CrossRef] [Medline]

Servei Català de la Salut. Activitat assistencial de la xarxa sanitària de Catalunya, any 2012. Departament de Salut. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/11351/1025 [accessed 2022-08-11]

Tschandl P, Codella N, Akay BN, Argenziano G, Braun RP, Cabo H, et al. Comparison of the accuracy of human readers versus machine-learning algorithms for pigmented skin lesion classification: an open, web-based, international, diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol 2019 Jul;20(7):938-947 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]

Kamulegeya LH, Okello M, Bwanika JM, Musinguzi D, Lubega W, Rusoke D, et al. Using artificial intelligence on dermatology conditions in Uganda: a case for diversity in training data sets for machine learning. bioRxiv. Preprint posted online October 31, 2019 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]

Brinker TJ, Hekler A, Enk AH, Berking C, Haferkamp S, Hauschild A, et al. Deep neural networks are superior to dermatologists in melanoma image classification. Eur J Cancer 2019 Sep;119:11-17 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]

Haenssle HA, Fink C, Schneiderbauer R, Toberer F, Buhl T, Blum A, Reader study level-I and level-II Groups, et al. Man against machine: diagnostic performance of a deep learning convolutional neural network for dermoscopic melanoma recognition in comparison to 58 dermatologists. Ann Oncol 2018 Aug 01;29(8):1836-1842 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]

Downloads

How to Cite

Haifa Hassan Jannah, Dalia Fahad Ramadan, Ranad Mohammed Khashab, Shokran Faisal Sulaimani, Abeer Muala Alahmadi, Nada Abdulghani Sarooji, Hanan Fawaz Sabban, Saud Ghalib Almahdaly, and Sara Waleed Hefni. 2024. “Examine the Influence of AI Tools on the Workflow of Dermatology Practice, Focusing on Diagnostic Efficiency, Patient Management, and Clinician Decision-Making”. Metallurgical and Materials Engineering 30 (4):300-307. https://doi.org/10.63278/10.63278/mme.v31.1.

Issue

Section

Research