Metallic Materials in Radiology: Addressing Image Artifacts and Improving Diagnostic Accuracy

Authors

  • Eman Faisal Ahmad Albaharnah Radiology Specialist, Dammam Medical Complex, Saudi Arabia
  • Zahra Abdulaziz Alzuraiqi X-Ray Technician, Dammam Medical Complex, Saudi Arabia
  • Mohammed Dahman M. Alshahri X-Ray Technician, Dammam Medical Complex, Saudi Arabia
  • Zainab Suliman Al-Abbad Radiology Technician, Dammam Medical Complex, Saudi Arabia
  • Abdullah Hamed S Al Shammary Specialist Radiological Technology, Dammam Medical Complex, Saudi Arabia
  • Hawraa Abdulghani Al Saffar Radiology Technician, Dammam Medical Complex, Saudi Arabia
  • Sukainah Arif Almuallim Radiology Technician, Dammam Medical Complex, Saudi Arabia
  • Dua'a Ali Ahmed Alsanonah Radiology Technician, Erada Complex and Mental Health in Dammam, Saudi Arabia
  • Abdulaziz Hasan Mustafa Al Shehri Radiology Specialist, Dammam Medical Complex, Saudi Arabia
  • Fatimah Jafar Alsalem Radiology Technician, Dammam Medical Complex, Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63278/10.63278/mme.v31.1

Keywords:

Metallic materials, Radiology, Medical imaging artifacts, Diagnostic accuracy, Titanium, Stainless steel, Cobalt-chromium alloys, Artifact reduction techniques, Dual-energy imaging, AI in radiology.

Abstract

Metallic materials play a critical role in radiology as biomaterials, components of implants, and parts of diagnostic and therapeutic devices. Despite their benefits, metallic materials pose significant challenges in medical imaging, such as image artifacts that can obscure diagnostic details and reduce accuracy. This paper explores the types and properties of commonly used metallic materials, including titanium, stainless steel, and cobalt-chromium alloys, and their applications in radiology. Challenges such as spray-shaped artifacts, attenuation, and scattering are discussed in detail. Techniques for reducing artifacts, including dual-energy imaging, iterative reconstruction, and advanced software algorithms, are examined. Additionally, emerging innovations such as AI-driven artifact correction, gold nanoparticle-based gels, and advanced imaging technologies are highlighted. The review aims to provide insights into current trends and future directions for optimizing the use of metallic materials in radiology, ensuring improved diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes.

References

Song, X., Cui, Q., Liu, Y., Xu, Z., Cohen, H., Ma, C., ... & Zhao, K. (2020). Metal‐free halide perovskite single crystals with very long charge lifetimes for efficient X‐ray imaging. Advanced Materials, 32(42), 2003353. researchgate.net

Zhang, J., Usman, K. A. S., Judicpa, M. A. N., Hegh, D., Lynch, P. A., & Razal, J. M. (2023). Applications of X‐Ray‐Based Characterization in MXene Research. Small Methods, 7(8), 2201527. wiley.com

Hu, X., Yan, P., Ran, P., Lu, L., Leng, J., Yang, Y. M., & Li, X. (2022). In situ fabrication of Cs3Cu2I5: Tl nanocrystal films for high-resolution and ultrastable X-ray imaging. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 13(13), 2862-2870. [HTML]

Njiti, M. M., Osman, N. D., Mansor, M. S., Rabaiee, N. A., & Aziz, M. A. (2024). Potential of Metal Artifact Reduction (MAR) and Deep Learning-based Reconstruction (DLR) integration in CT Metal Artifact Correction: A review. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 111541. iium.edu.my

Brukštus, M. (2022). Influence of medical implant materials on the appearance of medical imaging artifacts. ktu.edu

Bohner, L., Hanisch, M., Sesma, N., Blanck-Lubarsch, M., & Kleinheinz, J. (2022). Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging caused by dental materials: a systematic review. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 51(6), 20210450. oup.com

Selles, M., van Osch, J., Maas, M., Boomsma, M., & Wellenberg, R. (2023). Advances in metal artifact reduction in CT images: A review of traditional and novel metal artifact reduction techniques. European Journal of Radiology, 111276. ejradiology.com

Rousselle, A., Amelot, A., Thariat, J., Jacob, J., Mercy, G., De Marzi, L., & Feuvret, L. (2020). Metallic implants and CT artefacts in the CTV area: Where are we in 2020?. Cancer/Radiothérapie, 24(6-7), 658-666. sciencedirect.com

Cheraya, G., Sharma, S., & Chhabra, A. (2022). Dual energy CT in musculoskeletal applications beyond crystal imaging: bone marrow maps and metal artifact reduction. Skeletal radiology. [HTML]

de Lima Dias-Junior, L. C., Correa, M., Porto, O. C. L., Estrela, C., da Silveira Teixeira, C., Garcia, L. D. F. R., & Bortoluzzi, E. A. (2023). Influence of a Metal Artifact Reduction Filter on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Complete and Incomplete Vertical Root Fractures. Journal of Endodontics, 49(10), 1352-1361. [HTML]

Mödinger, Y., Anttila, E. D., Baker, G. M., Gross, D. C., & Porporati, A. A. (2023). Magnetic resonance safety evaluation of a novel alumina matrix composite ceramic knee and image artifact comparison to a metal knee implant of analogous design. Arthroplasty Today, 22, 101170. sciencedirect.com

Mihalko, W. M., Haider, H., Kurtz, S., Marcolongo, M., & Urish, K. (2020). New materials for hip and knee joint replacement: What's hip and what's in kneed?. Journal of Orthopaedic Research®, 38(7), 1436-1444. wiley.com

Adesanya, O. O. (2021). Prosthetic joint replacements in hips and knees: pilot study for the development of a single imaging test in patients with painful prosthetic joint replacements. 18 F …. warwick.ac.uk

Romanò, C. L., Petrosillo, N., Argento, G., Sconfienza, L. M., Treglia, G., Alavi, A., ... & Signore, A. (2020). The role of imaging techniques to define a peri-prosthetic hip and knee joint infection: multidisciplinary consensus statements. mdpi.com

Khodarahmi, I., Rajan, S., Sterling, R., Koch, K., Kirsch, J., & Fritz, J. (2021). Heating of hip arthroplasty implants during metal artifact reduction MRI at 1.5-and 3.0-T field strengths. Investigative radiology, 56(4), 232-243. google.com

Khodarahmi, I., Kirsch, J., Chang, G., & Fritz, J. (2021). Metal artifacts of hip arthroplasty implants at 1.5-T and 3.0-T: a closer look into the B1 effects. Skeletal Radiology. [HTML]

Choudhari, A., Gupta, A. K., Kumar, A., Kumar, A., Gupta, A., Chowdhury, N., & Kumar, A. (2024). Wear and friction mechanism study in knee and hip rehabilitation: A comprehensive review. Applications of biotribology in biomedical systems, 345-432. [HTML]

Ronoh, K., Mwema, F., Dabees, S., & Sobola, D. (2022). Advances in sustainable grinding of different types of the titanium biomaterials for medical applications: A review. Biomedical Engineering Advances, 4, 100047. sciencedirect.com

Bandyopadhyay, A., Mitra, I., Goodman, S. B., Kumar, M., & Bose, S. (2023). Improving biocompatibility for next generation of metallic implants. Progress in materials science, 133, 101053. sciencedirect.com

Sarraf, M., Rezvani Ghomi, E., Alipour, S., Ramakrishna, S., & Liana Sukiman, N. (2021). A state-of-the-art review of the fabrication and characteristics of titanium and its alloys for biomedical applications. Bio-design and Manufacturing, 1-25. springer.com

Sneha, K. R. & Sailaja, G. S. (2021). Intrinsically radiopaque biomaterial assortments: a short review on the physical principles, X-ray imageability, and state-of-the-art developments. Journal of Materials Chemistry B. [HTML]

Khandaker, M. U. & Ullah, M. H. (2024). Status and future outlook of X-ray shielding materials. Advanced Radiation Shielding Materials. [HTML]

Jiang, R., Smith, J., Yi, Y. T., Sun, T., Simonds, B. J., & Rollett, A. D. (2024). Deep learning approaches for instantaneous laser absorptance prediction in additive manufacturing. npj Computational Materials, 10(1), 6. nature.com

Shen, K., Zhang, R., Jin, Y., Li, Y., & Hu, Y. (2024). Inorganic metal oxide material BaSiO3: Eu2+ for convenient 3D X-ray imaging. Journal of Luminescence. ssrn.com

Rafiei, M., Raitoharju, J., & Iosifidis, A. (2023). Computer vision on x-ray data in industrial production and security applications: A comprehensive survey. Ieee Access. ieee.org

Hu, Y., Pan, Y., Song, Y., Meijering, E., Cui, Z., Zhao, Y., ... & Shen, D. (2022, March). Parallel sinogram and image framework with co-training strategy for metal artifact reduction in tooth CT images. In 2022 IEEE 19th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) (pp. 1-4). IEEE. [HTML]

Mendes Fonseca, C. (2024). Accuracy and stability of titanium dental implants placed with s-CAIS: an in vitro and in vivo pilot study. usal.es

Hu, X., Liu, H., & Baena, F. R. Y. (2021). Markerless navigation system for orthopaedic knee surgery: A proof of concept study. IEEE Access. ieee.org

Hu, X., Nguyen, A., & y Baena, F. R. (2021). Occlusion-robust visual markerless bone tracking for computer-assisted orthopedic surgery. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 71, 1-11. [PDF]

Bonmati, F. G. S., Pérez-Barquero, J. A., Ripoll, L. M. I., Rueda, C. L., Fernandez-Estevan, L., & Revilla-León, M. (2023). An additively manufactured, magnetically retained, and stackable implant surgical guide: A dental technique. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 130(4), 444-452. silimport.com

Ding, P. (2022). Light-sheet light-field fluorescence brain imaging enabled by implantable neural probes. utoronto.ca

Roelofs, T. (2021). Deep learning-based affine and deformable 3D medical image registration. aalto.fi

Downloads

Published

2024-12-14

How to Cite

Eman Faisal Ahmad Albaharnah, Zahra Abdulaziz Alzuraiqi, Mohammed Dahman M. Alshahri, Zainab Suliman Al-Abbad, Abdullah Hamed S Al Shammary, Hawraa Abdulghani Al Saffar, Sukainah Arif Almuallim, Dua’a Ali Ahmed Alsanonah, Abdulaziz Hasan Mustafa Al Shehri, and Fatimah Jafar Alsalem. 2024. “Metallic Materials in Radiology: Addressing Image Artifacts and Improving Diagnostic Accuracy ”. Metallurgical and Materials Engineering 30 (4):106-13. https://doi.org/10.63278/10.63278/mme.v31.1.

Issue

Section

Research